התדיינות אגרגטיבית– מודל אלטרנטיבי בהליך האזרחי

Translated title of the contribution: Aggregate Litigation: A Paradigm Shift in Civil Procedure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the use of aggregate litigation procedures (including joinder, class actions, group litigation, and consolidation of claims) to address complex disputes involving multiple parties and common questions of fact and law. The article reviews the alternative aggregation procedures available in Israel and abroad and examines how each achieves the various goals of civil procedure. It presents a normative framework for deciding when aggregation should be preferred over individual litigation, and howto choose among alternative aggregation mechanisms.
Translated title of the contributionAggregate Litigation: A Paradigm Shift in Civil Procedure
Original languageHebrew
Pages (from-to)139-176
Number of pages38
Journalמחקרי רגולציה
Volumeה'
StatePublished - 2022

IHP Publications

  • ihp
  • Actions and defenses
  • Attorney and client
  • Civil law
  • Civil procedure
  • Class actions (Civil procedure)
  • Conduct of court proceedings
  • Litigation
  • התדיינות משפטית
  • ייצוג משפטי
  • משפט אזרחי
  • סדר דין
  • סדר הדין האזרחי
  • תביעות ייצוגיות (משפט)
  • תביעות משפטיות

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aggregate Litigation: A Paradigm Shift in Civil Procedure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this