ÉTATS ET CONTINGENCES: COMMENT COMPRENDRE SAVAGE SANS QUE NUL NE SOIT DAMNÉ

Translated title of the contribution: States and contingencies: How to understand savage without anyone being hanged

Itzhak Gilboa*, Stefania Minardi, Larry Samuelson, David Schmeidler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Models of decision-making under uncertainty gain much of their power from the specification of states so as to resolve all uncertainty. However, this specification can undermine the presumed observability of preferences on which axiomatic theories of decision-making are based. We introduce the notion of a contingency. Contingencies need not resolve all uncertainty, but preferences over functions from contingencies to outcomes are (at least in principle) observable. In sufficiently simple situations, states and contingencies coincide. In more challenging situations, the analyst must choose between sacrificing observability in order to harness the power of states that resolve all uncertainty, or preserving observability by working with contingencies.

Translated title of the contributionStates and contingencies: How to understand savage without anyone being hanged
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)365-385
Number of pages21
JournalRevue Economique
Volume71
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Contingencies
  • Preferences
  • States
  • Uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'States and contingencies: How to understand savage without anyone being hanged'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this